As I have stated, I'm not entirely familiar with the full specifics of this exact exploit, my concern is communication by Daybreak and their process. My logic has not addressed the full specifics regarding this particular exploit and or how it was/is done, therefor my logic is not faulty as it has not addressed the extreme specifics. Though I would ask why you define it so explicitly as a "rule". I get you are saying that it is a set dynamic, but there are frequently modifications made to games to bypass existing dynamics. To reiterate what I've said in other posts, I'm not saying that anything the players did was "ok", I'm advocating a more explicit information process on the part of Daybreak. If Daybreak had mentioned this 4 years ago and explicitly said it was an exploit, then, yes, that would absolutely be support for the disciplinary action.