Completely Overlooked Downside of ZOE

lol this is so true, an should be stickied

Oh look, another thread about the VS defending their OP toys

Facts mate, facts we are simply stating them so people dont get confused by the silly forum warrior fringe who live to make up silly fantasy's.

Sure you are. Just like back in the days you were proving facts about the Magrider

So where is this completly overlooked downside ?

That's the whole point of this thread it has no downside!

Ok, I'm gone.

This is what SOE is going to do. (Think Magrider)

With all the nerf cries on the forums, SOE will nerf ZOE into the ground. After everyone complains SOE went to far, SOE will see fit to buff ZOE back to where it was before the nerfs.

But now, No one uses VS maxes and it wont matter if the ZOE is effective because the FOTM crowd will be getting something else nerfed.

So don't worry people, All will be well

A offensive ability that has zero downsides is not balanced

If the 30% damage boost ZOE gave also had it take 30% extra damage, that would be fine, but its not, it gets a 15% speed boost, 30% damage boost and only takes 15% more damage

There is absolutely no reason to not be using ZOE at all times, I would argue you should take 35% damage because you also get that speed boost

Your op toy will be nerfed soon enough

Deal with it

Where are you getting those numbers from? Has anyone actually done some live fire testing with an enemy as to how much damage is added?