Added Flash
Here's an updated graph for the Sparring Target, for anyone interested. The damage increase at CR 137 is just barely above 3%. Unfortunately that's...
yes, all the WM version combos are really different moves with no apparent connection to their non-WM counterparts except animation. I think they...
I think it's intended but that tooltip is outdated. It started with GU47 where they blanket buffed non-WM combos by 50% to make them more...
Updated for GU51. I just copied the patch notes and added the exact % damage increase. Weapons A Small increase has been made to the damage of the...
yup, it's DPS stat which is weap DPS + prec/10. It should be under "weapon damage" in the first post. if you multiply the damage/sec numbers in...
That's kind of hard to answer. It'll depend on what CR you're at now, what CR NPCs you're fighting, how much you can afford to buy new gear, etc. I...
Stats vs. CR There's not much real point in looking at this since stats and CR go hand in hand, but it might be interesting to see how much of your...
The New Defense Conversion After GU47, defense now scales with max CR instead of level, which shows up as "Combat Rating" in your stats window....
Damage Taken - Tier 7 Damage taken is much harder to test, so I don't have much data here. I can say that it seems to correlate with damage...
Damage Inflicted - Tier 1 I didn't test T2, so I can't say if it looks the same as T1. At 83 CR, damage seems to hit a cap of 900% normal damage...
Damage Inflicted - Tier 3 And T3 looks kind of like T4. After the giant damage spike, it continues to scale as usual. [IMG] Like T4, there are...
Damage Inflicted - Tier 4 T4 looks sort of like T5. The same thing happens at CR 70, 84, 100, and 117, but the massive damage spikes happen...
Damage Inflicted - Tier 5 T5 looks a lot different. You see the same drops in damage at CR 70, 84, 100, and 117, but now you also see what happens...
Damage Inflicted - Tier 6 T6 looks pretty similar to T7. From 111 to 100 CR, for this CR 111 NPC at least, the CR differential curve looks exactly...
Separate names with a comma.