Discussion in 'News and Announcements' started by dreamweaver, Aug 7, 2019.
Well the Panda is solo content.
So do you have some inside information nobody else seems to have on exactly what the loot dropping in here will be? You are inferring that you do by saying the least DBG can do is to "put some exciting must have loot in there..." . Do you know that there is not? Just wondering.
Agreeable... maybe we shouldn't make presumptions about what content may or may not be included. We have no way of knowing until it is released.
I only have one tidbit of inside information. I was told from a really good source that we won't see the reset hammer. I was mainly referring to the lack of pulse raising items in the game since TOT.
All I remember having for KA was the 100% Rising Tide charm, and even it was weaksauce compared to the reset hammer. I got mine, and then shortly after they nerfed Rising Tide into oblivion. RIP Rising Tide.
For POP, I guess the crafting flying goat mount was semi-exciting. The meta collection double-cast neck was worth going after, but once again nothing drool worthy.
There wasn't a single piece of "exciting" gear for this XPAC, just items with a little more resolve, POT, & such. I think if they're going to bring us this huge time sink of a contested zone, they should but some sexy lootz in it to make it worth our time to run. Otherwise, I know I'll be using my gaming time to do more time efficient stuff. Make the rewards worth the efforts.
from Discord. Nothing to do there.
“Fabled Kael Drakkel: (Test current) zonelines at Outer Kael and Prophecy hub in Library Resolve 1575 – T1 trash 1625 – T1 named 1750 – T2 trash 1910 – T2 named & x2 2395 – x4 Merchant area: currently Banker, Mender and Status Merchant (nothing new at this stage) Usual Kael contested rules: social aggro, large range. No guild flag dropping Portals – no current quest. Currently working from each area to Hypogeum only. No portal at zoneline. Halls of Legend (Throne Room) portal to Halls of Contention (Rotunda of Victory) working. Markables – some working, some not. Clickable Mission Quests (in 6 areas) reward Kromzek Loot Bag, heirloom shiny (unique to each quest) Collections – 11 sets from ground spawns with meta set(s) 7 shinies per set with one no trade.Rewards: 95 resolve items (142.5 resolve weapons)”Oh yay... more collections to never want to finish. I am overwhelmed with meh...
"All I remember having for KA was the 100% Rising Tide charm, and even it was weaksauce compared to the reset hammer. I got mine, and then shortly after they nerfed Rising Tide into oblivion. RIP Rising Tide."
It is far past time to see the reset items come back into play. My hammer and runes are collecting dust. Remove the silly restrictions on the old ethereal runes from the current Rune of the Celestial and call it a day.
I understand your points on this and agree with you, that there should be loot worthy of a contested fabled zone at that level.
Can I get a server that just stops? Not some dinosaur tle server but one that just stops and let's me retire. I'm old and carpel tunnel is causing me to need 3 years per expansion
Not asking for handouts but this please.
I really liked Kael and look forward to going there again
Love killing Giants and Dragons, well Goblins and Orcs too lol
Many of us like to solo. hard core raiders, have a place. Just not in my life. time family, you know grandkids, kids and wife take priority. yet I enjoy eq2 and have been playing since 2004
I prefer solo or molo. I might group in EQ II, but my experiences grouping in EQ were terrible.
I've been in EQ from 2004 to 2019. I set up two of my accounts over here when All Access came in. Stopped playing EQ II, and then came back this year.
Been enjoying it so far.
Technically, your statement should be "you are implying that you do." You, on the other hand, are "inferring" that he may have some inside information based on his statement. People mix these two up all the time. People "imply" something when they make a statement. The reader or listener is inferring when they ask for clarification or make assumptions. Trump says, "that guy is a nutcase." He implies he's an authority on the subject on what nutcases are. I infer from that statement that Trump may not have the intelligence or education to draw that conclusion or that he is a bully. Throw this in the category, "I'm bored and waiting for the server to come back up." The grunt you hear is me falling on my sword, haha.
Separate names with a comma.