In another thread, someone claimed that 60 Luck is the start of a new tier. In an older thread, I’d read that Luck tiers operate in 1-10, 11-20, 21-30, etc. levels, meaning that as long as you get 51 Luck, you’re in the top tier. Neither thread had any parsed data to back those ranges up. I don’t know which is accurate. But it would make more sense for the second to be accurate, as it would have each tier be exactly 10 points across. And, on the assumption that it is, that means you have 9 points to play with while still remaining in the top tier. You rolled a 2 on a cloak? Unlucky you. You’re either 3 points below the max tier ... or you have 6 more points to play with while still remaining in the max tier (assuming you’re planning on being there or are there already). Long story short : its not the end of the world.
The groups or zone are 10 points. They start at 0 You're going to be hard pressed to find a big difference in 59 and 60 though
Are you sure? Because I noticed a huge jump in Lucky messages when I went from 0 Luck to 1 Luck (as in, no Lucky flurries crits etc. to having some, an infinite % increase). That implies that the tiers start at 1, not 0. Of course, it could also mean that the first tier is smaller than 10 points, and is only 9 points.
LOL. Imagine getting 5 1 luck items in a row. 5 raid muhbis. Why in the world would a raid gear luck system be implemented in this manner is completely beyond me. Sure, it's "luck", but risk v reward in this case is far out of whack. It should be a guaranteed 3-5 luck on ANY raid item that has luck on it.
If maxing out luck is a priority for you then you are trying to min max your char. If you are min maxing you char, there are only 2 spots to put a raid muhbis that hava a luck value (ear and charm), if luck is of your concern and you didn’t make one of those items you are already wasting a muhbis so what does a low luck number matter.
Correct, There *is* a 60, and yes, it is not a huge increase, but it is an increase. It is for that extra "2%" (not's not actually 2%... thats the "saying." as I heard it ) It's that last large effort for a small increase. Think diminishing returns, but less programmatic. Yeah, they do start at 1.
