And arguments have been made. 75% ADS on LMGs removes the primary downside of HA ability, the class already overloaded with advantages in form of AV capabilities, meaning it sacrifices little by carrying medkits instead of C4, which also frees up implant slot for something combat enhancing, and large magazines, which is also a big advantage. Mobility is not HA trait, nor it is VS trait, nor it should be "NS trait", when NS isn't even a faction, so there's no faction balance to preserve. That doesn't require proving. Hard, datamined movement speed stats have been presented, and I don't think I need to prove that HA can use rocket launcher and that LMGs have large magazines. 75% ADS on LMGs adds to the long list of advantages of HA class, which increases its popularity beyond healthy, and breeds a special kind of players who only pick HA to easily win 1 v 1 fights and feel cool about it, when it should not even be what the game is about. 75% ADS on LMGs is harmful for the game and should be removed. I'm not saying anything new here, all of that has been said previously, by many different people, many times over. That's the arguments we stand on. One of the counterarguments was "nope, you're wrong, 75% ADS does nothing". This counterargument collapses in on itself. If it does nothing, then the one who made that counterargument has no stake, and no reason to oppose changes. Another laughable counterargument was "75% ADS only does something at X range". Who the **** cares? It's still an undeserved advantage.