Hi all. I play mainly as TR but after listenning some NC friends on TS blaming about their guns, i decided to play NC to get some directives, i record 1h and upload my best moments with my personal opinion. After getting all NC Heavy assult guns, its time to play my other favorite class, the MEDIC, and lets start playing the GR-22, its not the playstyle i like to play as medic, but its the way to get the Gold medic gun (i cant remember right now its name) Feel free to add your opinion on my weapons´s conclusion to create overall idea about it, thanks
Still confused on your videos and why you continue to make them? I mean if you really want to show that NC weapons aren't bad grab the saw and make a 30 minute video with no cuts and pure gameplay. If there is no fight simply skip to a fight and press tab.
Better than all the continues PPA whine threads. And always funny when people who complain about their weapons actual gets proof that their weapons are just fine.
I liked the video. Do people find that they have less hit detection issues when they use the Enhanced Targeting implant? I like it, but I often find myself using some other implant instead.
here u got a 2 old months NC6 Gauss Saw, its my first video uploaded, its an Esamir alert Following Zukhov, btw, Gauss Saw is my favorite HA gun
I don't get it. This gun is virtually identical to the TR TAR. They're both 800 RoF hipfire guns. The TAR is obviously better due to its 40 ammo, but other than that they're near identical. Why would you hop on your NC if you main TR just to play with what is essentially a TR gun?
Because a video with a most non-NC AR of the wholel NC AR selection is an argument for all NC weapons being great. Obviously.
The SAW is a niche long range weapon that takes 300-400 certs of attachments to be at its best. And its given to BR1s who don't even know how to use such a weapon, with none of those attachments. Its user statistics are meaningless. The SAW is definitely not the worst LMG, it's just the worst LMG you could give to BR1s.
That might be because it's being placed into the hands of BR1s that don't know how to use it. Sort of skewers the statistics towards bad.
Stats can be sorted by excluding everyone but high BRs. In fact, you can see each BR tier individually and see the rate of improvement.
Sure, the good old default weapon effect. But also because Saw is suboptimal weapon for the most prevalent combat situations and is good choice only in the niche which is either uncommon for PS2 metagame or is not a niche you want/should be in as a Heavy.
What I am saying, it's worst performing LMG 1-25, 26-50, 51-75, 76-100, separately counted. That's what is across all the BRs.
This is true but even when filtering these, it's still skewed by being a starter weapon since high BR players will still use default weapons on classes they don't use most often. All of the starter weapon score on the low side across all BRs, with the exception of the Orion(which still probably scores lower than it should). Popularity / availability skew things heavily regardless of BR. Check the AR Q4 KPU and you'll see some odd things too - the H-V45, TAR, TRV are the lowest Q4 KPU Assault Rifles. Reaper, Terminus, Torq are all toward the top - more expensive and/or newer weapons just tend to score higher. If you want to make an argument for weapon balance you cannot rely on usage stats alone. If you wanted to argue that SAW shouldn't be the NC starter LMG though, usage stats would be more relevant as new players are clearly not very successful with it.
btw i always start using the worst guns to my playstyle, indeed GR-22 was a pain to hit auraxium medal with my playstyle, next gun will be the Carnage another one i dont like, i really enjoy playing the Reaper DMR, thats why i dont like to play short range guns. and btw, sorry to post so late, but these days i only can go online one day per week or so, and only can read forum, forget to see me playing
