When you're assuming headshots for one weapon, you -have- to assume the same with others, as headshots are not stastistically predictable, and between the two weapons, there is a relatively insignificant numerical difference in the headshot ratios. Because of this, when balancing, you have to assume they headshot at about a 1-1 ratio. Maybe a 1-.98 ratio, at best.
At BR 100 Orion's AHS% is 0.284 Anchor AHS% is 0.294 MSW-R AHS% is 0.296 That's a difference of at least 0.01 over the Orion. That's looks really insignificant, but the H-V45 (least AHS% accurate VS AR) is 0.216 and the Corvus (most AHS% accurate VS AR) is 0.248, or a difference of three times that of the Orion/Anchor/MSW-R.* The H-V45 has a significant DPS advantage AND movement speed over the Corvus, yet the Corvus has much better KPU and KPH numbers proving that weapons with better headshot numbers (because they're more accurate) are better than ones with movement speed advantages, even if they have horrible DPS. *I excluded the burst and S variants.
you put the advanced laser sight and soft point ammo and you hipfire and you win o_o hipfire move speed is better than any ads speed simple! and if you must go medium+ range then burst it 4 roundish imo msw-r is better because your gonna win more "in your face" "one on one" battles and all those building fights..
