Yes, I know, this thread's been done a billion times, but I just can't keep my mind off it, and none of the other threads really seem to know what they are talking about/ I own both the weapons, and plan to Araxium both of them, for the NC LMG Directive. But, even as the Anchor is touted as perhaps the best LMG in the NC, nay, the entire game, I can't help but feel, well, disappointed by the Anchor. I know, how blasphemous of me. How dare I speak ill of the Anchor! Sure, I do "well" with it, but it's recoil feels like I'm trying to draw abstract art in my foes' skull. At medium range, it feels practically hopeless. And then, I bought the GD-22s, and it was like a bright, glorious light of unbiased recoil shined down upon my loadout screen. The thing handles like liquid butter in my hands, not hot butter, just lukewarm piss-your-pants-in-relaxation warm. The pathetic and minuscule RoF reduction was easily compensated by how much more effective it was at range, and even was somewhat countered by how much easier it is to burst for the head at close range. Am I using the Anchor wrong? I've tried Laser and Grip, SPA, but nothing makes me want to use the weapon over the GD-22S. People always talk like the Anchor and the GD are neck-and-neck, but from what I've experienced, it seems to me that the GD has already won the race. Many will say that the differences between the two are negligible, but the GD just handles laps around the Anchor.