There is a big difference between comparing specific details, and comparing an overall functionality. You are comparing specific details about the cloak and weaponry. I am comparing the overall usefulness of stealth classes in general. That is your opinion. I consider the infiltrator to be extremely useful. Yep, that's the exact reason why i dismiss it. And i always bring an infiltrator. Maybe they think it is weak, because there are so few good infiltrators? Also, i find that a lot of outfit leaders completely lack any sort of strategic and tactical thinking and just want to overwhelm the enemy with sheer numbers. Yes, bombercon was one of my favorite profiles. However nobody ever brought a Bombercon or Meleecon to AvA. Most people didn't even bring Bombs at all. It was always snipercon, except for some extremely unorthodox recons who differed. But they were an overwhelming minority. The rest is once again just your personal opinion, and you still know why i think you are wrong. Still your opinion. Apart from blowing up vehicles in a general sense (I've probably destroyed more vehicles with my infiltrator this weekend than most Heavy Assaults destroy in a month), there is nothing that the Infiltrator cannot do that the Light Assault, or Heavy Assault can do. Like Demon said, i'd like to prefer if this did not turn into yet another stale battle between the two of us, since it should be well known that we don't agree, and i have told you why. I have ill answered what i feel necessary about this post, and i'll not reply to you any more in this thread.