Anymore Proof VS is OP?Seriously Enough is Enough

WELCOME WELCOME WELCOME
To failures of epic proportions:

Too bad that the carv and the orion share the
EXACT
SAME
RECOIL

Conclusively! If you happened to be better on vanu guess what?
It has NOTHING to do with the weapon you were using.
Congratulations on creating this failure/troll topic. I only hope that SOE has the common sense NOT to listen to children like the OP.

TR won the UES so theyre OP. Maybe they need a flat out 50% reduction in bullet damage.

Now show the reload times. If you are comparing the weapons then COMPARE EVERYTHING. Typical Vanu players.

typical cry baby, we have quicker reloads, you have triple the bullets in one clip, case closed go whine somewhere else.

Nothing like Salty tears on a Saturday morning, mmmm.

Typical TR players, you're ignoring the reason you have longer reload times and that is a magazine double the size, in your words "COMPARE EVERYTHING" or not? If it suits your argument.

/FACEPAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALM

Typical cretin.

When you have reload times less than 2 seconds it doesn't matter how much ammo WE can hold. You take a few shots, activate your shield, run around a corner, reload to full clip and start your spray and pray over.

That argument goes both ways. You have a slightly smaller magazine size because your reload times are non existant. That WOULD be balanced but unfortunately it isn't since your rilfes have almost no recoil. And all of that is combined with an insanely high ROF.

Im not sure what to say about VS is OP or not. They have a good tank and a low bullet drop. Okay that far. But all the sentences here about it give me more questions than answers.

Are all VS players smarter than every one else ? Are TR players are just stupid whiners ? Noclue...
Is VS = OP ? Or do they just outnumber all other fractions ? Noclue...
Need any fraction a BUFF or a NERF ? ? Noclue...

Greetingsfrom Shypa ( Server Woodman )

while you can aim your gun at the corner I ran toward, wait for me to show myself and shoot me, isn't that difficult.

easy decrease rof fire a little above nc's.

It's the side effect of playing a game in easy-mode, get used to it or switch faction and try your skills in hard-mode.
It's same as thumping your chest about finishing Diablo 3 in 3 days and then others tell you "But...did you win it in nightmare mode, because I did..."
In PS2, when you play in hard-mode (NC) any accomplishment feels much more sweeter because you know you beat the odds.
Understand now?

Almost no recoil? Sigh...are you a special needs child or something? There is a video right on this page proving you wrong. Why are you being willfully ignorant?

See? You are taking one thing and blowing it out of proportion. How about you look at every metric and then talk?

- You have the numbers (e.g on Woodman its 37% TR, 37% NC, 30% VS)
- We have the skills
-----------------------------------
- We still won over most of matches in the leaderboard /& scoreboard.

What would happen if we could have the privilege playing against same numbers ? Imagine that ...

On what basis? Get off the crack pipe or present solid proof that you have the best "skills".

Enough is enough! I have had it with these motherf***ing Vanus in this motherf***ing game!

I'm really tired of hearing "easy mode" and "hard mode" thrown around. Its not productive, or helpful.

very cool to see Vs defending everything .
I would do that also if i was them lol

Anybody that is not delusional can deduce that if you have the lowest population in the game and still won the challenge it is not because you have a disproportionate amount of better players it is because you have better weapons.

It is also pretty obvious that you are allowed atm to have better weapons BECAUSE you have the lowest population.