You can, but that's a classic example of a "one sided biased opinion".
Maybe it was your cheesy argument that made me gag.
No reaction? Fine, to some extent. No aiming? Have you even tried long distance AV? Or tried to get a direct hit on some HA popping in and out of...
If you don't use tanks, it means that you've never or rarely have been in the receiving end of AV. Meaning that you are biased. It's like...
Avoiding the issue... How intelligent of you.
HAHAHAHAHA nice joke. What have you been playing all along? You've come to the wrong forums kid. You lost all credibility the moment you said...
The moment you realise that this is a combined arms game.
Yeah. I guess not everyone knows how to play a war game.
Try googling for the meanings. Most of the acronyms are common military terms, such as AA, AI, AV, RPG, APC, IFV, MG, AR, LAV, etc. Basically general...
Someone can't deal with AI tanks. *snickers*
Stop crying.
So do you think this change will improve gameplay any bit? Since you said that this game is doomed to fail in a few years time. Instead of...
Remember South Ossetia? Where was US then? Yes I'm very sure the Vietnamese villagers in My Lai felt very protected. Protect smaller countries?...
Well said.
We should just make the Striker common pool and see how many people from other fractions would use it.
Separate names with a comma.
