I wanted to know which gun, when fitted with both the Barrel compensator and Rail Forward Grip, has less recoil overall. It's more for mid range sniping purposes, which hasn't been a real issue with the TMG-50, but I wanted to make sure upgrading to the T9 Carv-S would be worth the 1000 Certs
Tested both--found the TMG-50 to have slightly less recoil for long distance combat. However, the difference is not very noticeable when they are both equipped with a compensator and the carv-s fares much better in CQB, making it the better all-round gun.
TMG-50 is good when you want to do mid++ range, its easier to plant more bullets on target. But I find it lacking in close range damage. So I tend to stick to the Carv-S either way, if I need to do the mid++ range battles then I use even more burst fire to compensate for the bulletspread. Cause then I know I have the hitting power if the fight all of a sudden turns to close range.
I have compensator and forward grip on both. I have been enjoying the TMG-50 better. I will test this evening and post result.
Liking the comments so far. I may stick with a T Carv-S with compensator and grip for the added CQB damage. Then switch to burst fire mode for sniping
