I don't think that the tone is aggressive, hostile or impolite. You could call it determined. It's a (relative) neutral writeup of problems. If you take your examples, eg "We feel that Health Regen has been tried for years...". It's not a feeling, it's a fact that health regen doesn't help on raids. Reading your text I thougt, where is the passage "We, the people...". Sorry, I don't see why a dev should have a problem with the style of the text. "If you play a little devil's advocate you can easily kill most of the arguments made." Which? "Dev's have become trained to ignore hostile language and arguments that are based on balance issues between classes. If the arguement for your class names another class, they ignore you."Look at the Ranger forum. They compared themselves all the time with Assasins (who else should they?) and they got all the stuff they wanted to be as powerful as them. How do you think you are supposed to ask for class balance without naming the problems in class balance?