Fame/infamy being rewarded only from someone a title below, equal, or one title above is the way it should be. Anyone else remember the rarity of seeing a Master titled player roaming around? Anyone remember everyone being Overseer/Overlord after the changes to the system? Think it's obvious which system is better. I definitely think that grey con players should gain fame/status/etc off of red con players. But I also think they should lose fame to red con players if they've engaged. That's how it used to be and that's how it should be again. The gear was way different then, where a 70 Ranger could kill our entire locked T5 group with a single Rain of Arrows. It made it a challenge to kill 70s (which we did), and we were rewarded for doing so. Either way, as it is now, a grey can jump in a fight between two conning players, influence the outcome, with no personal risk to him or herself. There's no gain, either, but it's still an influence. I'd be all for that happening again with both opportunity to gain and risk to lose being reinstated. Leaching already happens (and continued to happen after the change to rewards from red cons), so there's really no issue in my mind.