Maybe Lock the next progression to GoD, OoW or TSS?

Discussion in 'Time Locked Progression Servers' started by Berkwin, Jan 4, 2023.

  1. Dre. Altoholic

    Now that sounds like a party.
  2. itzagame_m8s Journeyman


    Use of the word literally as a rhetorical device and not as what literally means.

    -10 points.

    Aristotle taught that a speaker's ability to persuade an audience is based on how well the speaker appeals to that audience in three different areas: logos, ethos, and pathos. Considered together, these appeals form what later rhetoricians have called the rhetorical triangle.



    Logos, or logic is where the facts are. <== (You are NOT here)

    Ethos, or the character of the person with an opposing viewpoint.

    Pathos, play to their emotions. <== (You are here)
  3. itzagame_m8s Journeyman

    Hardcore heritage gear is 71 to equip though....


    Much better party imo )
    Dre. likes this.
  4. Zombucket New Member

    Mischief had a great cadence early on.
    Classic was 4 weeks.
    Kunark, Velious, Luclin were 8 weeks each.
    I would like to see the new server continue the 8 week interval on.
    and launce LDoN with PoP, and 8 weeks for all of it. Going from 8 week expansions to effectively 16 weeks of PoP was not good.

    Especially on a random loot - free trade server, I see no reason for any expansion to continue for more than 8.
  5. Ishbu Augur


    Man, you must not know what the word literally means.

    This thread is asking for a server to lock at GoD, OOW, or TSS. I know you think highly of yourself, but your post indicates a fundamental lack of understanding of things going on around you, so Im going to spell this out slowly.

    GoD is not where the Agnarr server is locked.

    OOW is not where the Agnarr server is locked.

    TSS is not where the Agnarr server is lokedd.

    As these are not the same, then this would be asking for a server with a lock point that is yet another expansion further than where Agnarr is already locked.

    Therefore, it literally is proof that people will ask for a new lock point, which is exactly what the previous poster said, that was then being refuted by another party, who received the response you decided to quote without even understanding the context of the statement.

    Try and do better in the future.


    To phrase another way and repeat in an effort to help you learn, this thread is actually showing that people will ask for lock points a step past any lock point that was created. This is not an exaggeration or hyperbole of any kind, its all here in black and white and you dont even have to read past the first post to find it.