It seems like a change of this nature would solve the most problems, and also keep the most people happy. Expansion content should remain...
Don't worry, there's always this guy to help console your tears and give you free XP: [IMG][IMG][IMG]
This response sounds like it's coming from a developer alt account, because it's the only way you'd have access to run reports on subscription...
What a narrow minded response, which betrays your complete lack of business sense. Are you under the impression that there are significant...
Excellent, eloquent post which cuts to the heart of the matter. Daybreak's devs are clearly out of touch with the community that has faithfully...
Absolutely agree, this is just common sense and needs to be addressed. Completely missed the point. If dichotomic is exempt from the...
This absolutely needs to be addressed. If dichotomic has been exempted from the benefits of SCF, it needs to be exempted from the costs and...
Sounds like a scientific deduction. I'd agree you are correct and were able to compensate for sub-par rangers and still succeed!
Brohg maybe you should add a level 85 heroic Ranger to your sig to give you some street cred.
Thanks for taking the time to dig that up. Looks like you enjoy beating the horse too. Some quotes from the thread: Evidently that...
I'm glad the lack of consistency amuses you. I don't care about the aug change one way or another, and I'll be happy to acknowledge that it's a...
They're allowing that on two old augs. Everything after "basically" in that statement is conjecture and hogwash. This isn't some new system of...
Can you please direct me to Frozen Orb of the Fabled King fix thread on the Daybreak issue tracker?
All very good points, and I think the discussion in this thread has been productive. The parse post from tanksalot is particularly revealing....
I wasn't trying to single anyone out, just looking for some consistency in design. Is this in writing somewhere? Doesn't seem to be...
So based on the logic applied in this thread, you don't want a focused version added because "our dps is good enough without it," but you don't want...
It seems like less of an issue about dps, and more of a development oversight. Why was the line continued at all into TBM? Using Squall of Blades Rk....
I guess that's appropriate in an expansion with broken in the title, they can write off everything as working as designed.
Reported: https://dgcissuetracker.com/browse/EQ-856
Why is there still no focused (single target) version of this spell? Do we just have to wait until the next level cap increase expansion, and hope...
Separate names with a comma.
