So... Can someone politely inform me, why Fire's AM is actually contradictory to every current AM mechanic? I know people have justified complaints about Mass Dets inconsistency. But I don't even feel that is the sole issue. Another understated issue is that, Fireburst is weaker than Mass Det. The Risk Vs. Reward system is not in play. The dynamic between Fireburst and Mass Det is completely opposite the dynamic between Arctic Gust and Avalanche. EMP and Dart. Mass Terror and Mass Levitation. And for some reason the risk that the cast time can be interrupted is not considered when evaluating the damage. It's not like Ice's AM. You get interrupted during Fire's Am and you get NOTHING. You get interrupted during Ice's AM? Your damage is only partially halted. Hell I feel most of the damage is on the front end of the channel anyway lol. People who ask for a fix to Mass Det are right. The move is too inconsistent. But where is all of the cries of justice for Fireburst? And I have also considered the fact that Fireburst is a primarily a set-up power and not a finisher. It is similar to distract/stealth in that regard. Interesting.... So unlike other AM's Fire has only one finisher??? Either way, it is inconsistent. An inconsistent one at that?