Arena Update is on Test now

Figurative speech? Now u changed the PVP subject to a english class? Dude... stop changing the subject........

wow that was quick.
but really 25% return heal in tank stance for rage, that doesnt seam right, fine for dps role but for a tank it seams off by a lot, ice gets 25% DR but has no crash to cancel.

whats wrong with rage DPS using relentess anger in PVP? its like ice DPS using reflection, helps u survive alittle so u dont die so quickly

What?. You cannot be serious. I was using figurative speech to say something and you did not understand it so I tried to explain it to you and you are here complaing that I am changing subjects...

Nothing beside the fact that they provide equal advantages to both side and the only to stop them is to debuff or to force them to crash through stuns. Since debuff are going away and you can easily get around stuns as a rage DPS. The devs saw nerfing it as the next practical way.

u see even he agrees that rage tanks healing 25% makes no sense sabigya

its the truth and its needs to be fixed. Dont know why you are so against it

Not against it. Trying to say this would have not happened if Rage DPS's did not abuse it and when I bothered to explain it to you, you either claim I am changing the subject or you do not understand.

Exactly, they offer equal advantages to both role. The one that should be getting all the advantage of rage crash should be rage tanks and not rage DPS. So why are u against it again?

Guys, I think you can chill about the rage thing. Just tested some more stuff and remorseless recovery is healing 1:1 for damage dealt in tank role, 25% in dps role. I believe that's actually a buff for DPS.

Also, they've done something to counter damage. Counters are doing way, WAY more damage on test than on live. At least twice as much. I think they've changed the formula somehow, probably to compensate for the decreased amount of prec on the new gear.

LOL. The proof is on page 2, i said it was unfair to rage tanks and u said it was "pretty fair". Go back to page 2 and read what you typed. I did not make any of those thing up.

PS: oh so u reported me now? for what? proving u that im right?[/quote]

Yea, It would be unfair if it was a 100% for rage tank would not it?. Since role debuffs are gone and every single tank power can reduce the mitigation. I am for rage tank's keeping it the same way it is now, as long as it posses a risk.
I don't think a mod would accept a report like "proved me wrong".

Yea, It would be unfair if it was a 100% for rage tank would not it?. Since role debuffs are gone and every single tank power can reduce the mitigation. I am for rage tank's keeping it the same way it is now, as long as it posses a risk.
I don't think a mod would accept a report like "proved me wrong".[/quote]

I checked page 2 and ice clown said 35%-50%.

I checked page 2 and ice clown said 35%-50%.[/quote]

I was quoting someone else on the post. I was not directly answering to his 35%-50% proposal.

My "I approve GIF."

When did I ever say 100%? Check page 2 for proof please.

Where did I quote you when you said 35-50%. Check page 2 for proof please.
I was saying that its a good thing they nerfed it, but I am all for bringing it up to any number [even a 100%] if it posses risk since Rage is supposed to be a "Risk vs Reward" power.

Either they changed their mind or formula bug. Who knows.

How did my 35%-50% get changed to 100%? I am so confused

This is actually probably a really, really good change for arenas then given that many powers can break out from counters. The way they did have it planned originally was going to very much lower the emphasis on counters.

Not my ideal solution though as that'd involve just fixing power breakouts.

Never turned your 35-50% to a 100% when I never directly quoted nor mentioned or hinted towards your post. I would prefer it if you could read before you start replying.
It was a rhetorical question can you stop trying to find something behind it.